Jesse Huta Galung vs Daniel Munoz-De La Nava Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W L W L
Form
W L L W L L W L W LH2H: Galung 2 - 1 Nava
They have played 5 sets in total, with Galung winning 4 and Nava winning 1. The last match between Galung and Nava was at the Alphen Challenger, 07-09-2014, Final, Clay with Jesse Huta Galung getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jesse Huta Galung | 2 |
| Daniel Munoz-De La Nava | 1 |
| Galung | Stats | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 91 | Highest Rank | 68 |
| 39 | Age | 43 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 29 | Titles | 11 |
| 60% (455-304) | Career Total W/L | 57% (521-389) |
| $182,886 | Career Prize Money | $282,573 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 7-5 7-6(3) |
Stats
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
13
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 5-2 ret. |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Jesse Huta Galung
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve %
52%
(
11 of
21)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
27
Total Points Won
17
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 28 | Games Won | 23 |
| 23 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:2:37 | Average Match Time | 1:2:37 |
| 60% (87/145) | 1st Serve % | 67% (116/173) |
| 82% (71/87) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (72/116) |
| 48% (28/58) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (31/57) |
| 44% (7/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (4/14) |
| 40% (70/173) | Return Points Win % | 32% (46/145) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jesse Huta Galung vs Daniel Munoz-De La Nava Best Odds For The Match
Jesse Huta Galung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Jesse Huta Galung
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Ruben Konings
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Jesse Huta Galung
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
6%
(
1 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Johan Nikles
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Shunsuke Wakita
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexandre Muller
Player
Jesse Huta Galung
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Germain Gigounon
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Adrian Bodmer
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Jakob Sude
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
73%
(
70 of
96)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
90%
(
46 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
52 of
70)
69%
(
25 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
16 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grzegorz Panfil
Player
Jesse Huta Galung
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Jan Choinski
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Sandro Ehrat
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
123)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
123)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Inigo Cervantes
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Nys
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
51%
(
45 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
52%
(
58 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
60%
(
32 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Munoz-De La Nava
Player
Nam Hoang Ly
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Galung vs Nava?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Galung Vs Nava is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (455/304) | Win/Loss | 57% (521/389) |
| 58% (1005/734) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1196/927) |
| 52% (8700/7892) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (10683/9535) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1974 | Aces Total | 1448 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1154 | Total Double Faults | 1385 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 83.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 114.35 |
| 56% (13215/23581) | 1st Serve % | 57% (18965/33123) |
| 73% (9619/13215) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (13232/18965) |
| 48% (5002/10366) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (7210/14158) |
| 41% (962/2341) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1469/3496) |
| 39% (9238/23748) | Return Points Win % | 41% (13739/33849) |
| 61% (447/728) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (511/884) |
| 21% (3/14) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 15% (2/13) |
| 56% (139/249) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (137/279) |
| 57% (124/217) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (145/301) |
| 88% (449/393) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (534/442) |
| 12% (449/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (534/91) |
| 20% (310/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (376/78) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
